Pick two ETFs to compare

Choose a ticker for A and B to see yield, expense ratio, 1-year and 5-year return and a risk note side by side. Enter an amount to compare estimated annual and monthly income.

What separates the most-compared pairs

The structural differences the numbers alone do not show.

SCHD vs VOO — income or total return

These represent income-oriented and total-return-oriented approaches within U.S. large caps. SCHD concentrates on quality dividend payers; VOO tracks the whole S&P 500 with a much lower yield but broader market coverage.

SCHD’s income is higher and more visible each quarter. VOO’s total return includes capital appreciation across every S&P 500 sector, including the high-growth technology names SCHD historically underweights. Comparing yield alone makes VOO look worse than a total-return comparison would.

SCHD vs VYM — strict screening or broad coverage

Both are ultra-low-cost, broadly diversified U.S. large-cap dividend ETFs. SCHD screens more strictly on dividend growth and quality; VYM covers a wider range of higher-yielding stocks.

Both emphasise financial stability and diversification. SCHD holds fewer names because of its quality screen, while VYM spreads across 400+ holdings.

SCHD vs JEPI — dividend growth or option premium

Two different routes to income. SCHD pursues dividend growth through stock ownership; JEPI adds an option strategy to produce high monthly distributions.

SCHD’s income tends to grow over time as portfolio companies raise payouts. JEPI’s distributions come partly from option premium, so they vary with market volatility — calmer markets mean smaller distributions.

JEPI vs JEPQ — same strategy, different base

Both use JPMorgan’s equity-premium-income approach, but on different equity bases. JEPI uses a low-volatility U.S. equity portfolio; JEPQ applies the same overlay to Nasdaq-100 style holdings.

JEPQ carries more growth potential and more volatility because of its technology weighting. JEPI’s low-volatility selection has historically produced a steadier income stream.

QYLD vs JEPQ — how much of the index is covered

Both are Nasdaq-linked covered-call funds, but they differ in coverage. QYLD writes calls on 100% of its index exposure; JEPQ uses a more selective overlay that preserves more upside.

QYLD’s full-coverage approach maximises current distributions but sharply limits price appreciation. JEPQ retains more room for share-price gains, though its 2022 inception means long-run results are still forming.

VOO vs SPY — same index, different cost

Both track the S&P 500 with nearly identical holdings. The practical difference is the expense ratio: 0.03% for VOO versus 0.0945% for SPY.

For long-term holders that gap compounds meaningfully over decades. SPY, however, has higher average daily volume and tighter bid-ask spreads, which can make it preferable for short-term trading. Holding period is the deciding factor.

Reading the comparison table

  • Yield is trailing twelve months and does not guarantee future distributions. Option-based products in particular vary with the volatility regime.
  • 5-year return is total return with dividends reinvested. Funds younger than five years show no value.
  • Taxes and currency are excluded. U.S. ETF distributions are generally subject to withholding at source and may be taxable again locally.
  • Costs beyond the expense ratio are excluded — bid-ask spread and currency conversion are separate.
  • Figures are periodically refreshed reference values, not real time.