<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>SCHD on InvestIQs — Investment Blog</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/tags/schd/</link><description>Recent content in SCHD on InvestIQs — Investment Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://investiqs.net/en/tags/schd/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Structuring a Late-Stage Retirement Portfolio: Analyzing SCHD's Dividend Efficacy for Investors in Their 50s</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/structuring-a-late-stage-retirement-portfolio-analyzing-schds-dividend-efficacy-/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/structuring-a-late-stage-retirement-portfolio-analyzing-schds-dividend-efficacy-/</guid><description>An empirical analysis of SCHD and VIG for late-stage retirement planning. Evaluates dividend yields, factor exposure, and critical portfolio drawdowns for investors in their 50s.</description></item><item><title>Traditional IRA vs 401(k) Tax Shield Data: Income Bracket Simulation a</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/traditional-ira-vs-401k-tax-shield-data-income-bracket-simulation-a/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/traditional-ira-vs-401k-tax-shield-data-income-bracket-simulation-a/</guid><description>A quantitative analysis of 401(k) and IRA tax shields, simulating income bracket impacts, liquidity constraints, and ETF factor allocation over multi-decade time horizons.</description></item><item><title>Data-Driven Analysis of Tax-Gain Harvesting: Utilizing the 0% LTCG Bracket for US ETFs</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/data-driven-analysis-of-tax-gain-harvesting-utilizing-the-0-ltcg-bracket-for-us-/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/data-driven-analysis-of-tax-gain-harvesting-utilizing-the-0-ltcg-bracket-for-us-/</guid><description>A data-driven analysis of tax-gain harvesting in taxable brokerage accounts. Explores utilizing the 0% long-term capital gains bracket to step up ETF cost basis.</description></item><item><title>The Hidden Traps of 20-Year DRIP Simulations: Risk and Volatility Anal</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/the-hidden-traps-of-20-year-drip-simulations-risk-and-volatility-anal/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/the-hidden-traps-of-20-year-drip-simulations-risk-and-volatility-anal/</guid><description>A data-driven analysis of the hidden volatility risks and tax drags in 20-year dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) simulations, comparing SCHD, VOO, and SPYD.</description></item><item><title>20-Year DRIP Reinvestment Simulation: Risk Data vs. Consensus Assumptions</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/20-year-drip-reinvestment-simulation-risk-data-vs-consensus-assumptions/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/20-year-drip-reinvestment-simulation-risk-data-vs-consensus-assumptions/</guid><description>20-year DRIP simulation reveals where consensus assumptions break down: tax drag, dividend cuts, and volatility risk — with peer ETF comparison data.</description></item><item><title>SCHD Dividend Growth Rate: 10-Year Trajectory — Separating Myth from Data</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/schd-dividend-growth-rate-10-year-trajectory-separating-myth-from-data/</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/schd-dividend-growth-rate-10-year-trajectory-separating-myth-from-data/</guid><description>SCHD&amp;#39;s 10-year dividend growth data reveals two rate-regime cycles. A quantitative SCHD vs VIG comparison on total return, yield, P/E, and drawdown risk — with disconfirming scenarios for 2026.</description></item><item><title>SCHD Dividend Growth CAGR: Yield Decomposition Across 10 Years</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/schd-dividend-growth-cagr-yield-decomposition-across-10-years/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/schd-dividend-growth-cagr-yield-decomposition-across-10-years/</guid><description>SCHD&amp;#39;s 3.29% yield and ~11% dividend CAGR since 2011 — yield decomposition and 10-year data reveal what total return figures hide about SCHD vs VIG for income investors.</description></item><item><title>JEPI vs. SCHD: Deconstructing Covered Call Premium Costs in a 5-Year Data Review</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/jepi-vs-schd-deconstructing-covered-call-premium-costs-in-a-5-year-data-review/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/jepi-vs-schd-deconstructing-covered-call-premium-costs-in-a-5-year-data-review/</guid><description>An in-depth analysis comparing JEPI and SCHD over five years, focusing on performance, dividend yield, and the often-overlooked covered call premium cost decomposition.</description></item></channel></rss>