<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Investing on InvestIQs — Investment Blog</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/categories/investing/</link><description>Recent content in Investing on InvestIQs — Investment Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://investiqs.net/en/categories/investing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Traditional IRA vs 401(k) Tax Shield Data: Income Bracket Simulation a</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/traditional-ira-vs-401k-tax-shield-data-income-bracket-simulation-a/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/traditional-ira-vs-401k-tax-shield-data-income-bracket-simulation-a/</guid><description>A quantitative analysis of 401(k) and IRA tax shields, simulating income bracket impacts, liquidity constraints, and ETF factor allocation over multi-decade time horizons.</description></item><item><title>Data-Driven Analysis of Tax-Gain Harvesting: Utilizing the 0% LTCG Bracket for US ETFs</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/data-driven-analysis-of-tax-gain-harvesting-utilizing-the-0-ltcg-bracket-for-us-/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/data-driven-analysis-of-tax-gain-harvesting-utilizing-the-0-ltcg-bracket-for-us-/</guid><description>A data-driven analysis of tax-gain harvesting in taxable brokerage accounts. Explores utilizing the 0% long-term capital gains bracket to step up ETF cost basis.</description></item><item><title>Traditional IRA vs. 401(k): Data-Driven Analysis of Tax Deduction Risks and Optimal Contribution Allocation</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/traditional-ira-vs-401k-data-driven-analysis-of-tax-deduction-risks-and-optimal-/</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/traditional-ira-vs-401k-data-driven-analysis-of-tax-deduction-risks-and-optimal-/</guid><description>A data-driven analysis comparing Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s. Evaluates liquidity risks, tax deduction mechanics, and portfolio optimization for US retail investors.</description></item><item><title>IRA Contribution Data: Analyzing the Trade-Off Between Tax Deductions and Liquidity Risk</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/ira-contribution-data-analyzing-the-trade-off-between-tax-deductions-and-liquidi/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/ira-contribution-data-analyzing-the-trade-off-between-tax-deductions-and-liquidi/</guid><description>Quantitative analysis of the trade-off between IRA tax deductions and liquidity constraints, evaluating capital allocation strategies for US retail investors.</description></item><item><title>Tax-Advantaged Account ETF Allocation: 5-Year Effective Tax Rate Analy</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/tax-advantaged-account-etf-allocation-5-year-effective-tax-rate-analy/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/tax-advantaged-account-etf-allocation-5-year-effective-tax-rate-analy/</guid><description>Quantitative analysis of tax-advantaged accounts (Roth IRA) versus taxable brokerages, focusing on ETF asset location, total return compounding, and effective tax drag over a 5-year horizon.</description></item><item><title>High-Yield ETF Trap Data Analysis: 5-Year Total Return and Volatility Risk of 8%+ Yield Assets</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/high-yield-etf-trap-data-analysis-5-year-total-return-and-volatility-risk-of-8-y/</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/high-yield-etf-trap-data-analysis-5-year-total-return-and-volatility-risk-of-8-y/</guid><description>A data-driven analysis of structural vulnerabilities in 8%+ yield ETFs, highlighting total return deficits, volatility drag, and principal erosion metrics.</description></item><item><title>The Hidden Traps of 20-Year DRIP Simulations: Risk and Volatility Anal</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/the-hidden-traps-of-20-year-drip-simulations-risk-and-volatility-anal/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/the-hidden-traps-of-20-year-drip-simulations-risk-and-volatility-anal/</guid><description>A data-driven analysis of the hidden volatility risks and tax drags in 20-year dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) simulations, comparing SCHD, VOO, and SPYD.</description></item><item><title>Volatility and Risk in Monthly Dividend ETFs: The Yield vs. Total Retu</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/volatility-and-risk-in-monthly-dividend-etfs-the-yield-vs-total-retu/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/volatility-and-risk-in-monthly-dividend-etfs-the-yield-vs-total-retu/</guid><description>A quantitative risk-reward analysis comparing JEPQ and JEPI, exposing the structural limitations of covered call ETFs and the paradox between high dividend yields and long-term total returns.</description></item><item><title>SCHD Dividend Growth Rate: 10-Year Trajectory — Separating Myth from Data</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/schd-dividend-growth-rate-10-year-trajectory-separating-myth-from-data/</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/schd-dividend-growth-rate-10-year-trajectory-separating-myth-from-data/</guid><description>SCHD&amp;#39;s 10-year dividend growth data reveals two rate-regime cycles. A quantitative SCHD vs VIG comparison on total return, yield, P/E, and drawdown risk — with disconfirming scenarios for 2026.</description></item><item><title>JEPQ Quarterly Dividend Increase Analysis: Evaluating Returns and Volatility Risk for High-Yield ETFs</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/jepq-quarterly-dividend-increase-analysis-evaluating-returns-and-volatility-risk/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/jepq-quarterly-dividend-increase-analysis-evaluating-returns-and-volatility-risk/</guid><description>An in-depth analysis of JEPQ&amp;#39;s recent quarterly dividend increase, evaluating its historical returns, dividend sustainability, and volatility risks within the context of covered call ETFs for US retail investors.</description></item><item><title>Korean Income Tax Filing Guide: The Dividend Threshold and IRP/ISA Tax Strategy</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/korean-income-tax-filing-guide-the-dividend-threshold-and-irpisa-tax-strategy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/korean-income-tax-filing-guide-the-dividend-threshold-and-irpisa-tax-strategy/</guid><description>English-localized research note on Korean comprehensive income tax filing, the KRW 20 million dividend and interest threshold, IRP and ISA tax credits, penalties, and high-dividend separate taxation.</description></item><item><title>Expense Ratio Compounding: 0.03% vs 0.5% Over 30 Years</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/expense-ratio-compounding-003-vs-05-over-30-years/</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/expense-ratio-compounding-003-vs-05-over-30-years/</guid><description>Expense ratio compounding model: 0.03% vs 0.5% over 30 years, with live ETF data, peer comparisons, and fee-drag scenarios.</description></item><item><title>TQQQ’s 5-Year Drawdown and Volatility Breakdown: Where 3x Lagged 2x</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/tqqqs-5-year-drawdown-and-volatility-breakdown-where-3x-lagged-2x/</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/tqqqs-5-year-drawdown-and-volatility-breakdown-where-3x-lagged-2x/</guid><description>A research note comparing TQQQ, QLD, and QQQ on five-year returns, drawdown, volatility, dividend yield, and path dependence to test whether 3x leverage really outpaces 2x.</description></item><item><title>QQQ vs SPY 10-Year Regression: Tech Concentration vs Diversification</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/qqq-vs-spy-10-year-regression-tech-concentration-vs-diversification/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/qqq-vs-spy-10-year-regression-tech-concentration-vs-diversification/</guid><description>QQQ vs SPY regression analysis on tech concentration, returns, and yield using exact yfinance data for US investors.</description></item><item><title>TQQQ Five-Year Drawdown and Volatility Decomposition: When 3x Trails 2x</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/tqqq-five-year-drawdown-and-volatility-decomposition-when-3x-trails-2x/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/tqqq-five-year-drawdown-and-volatility-decomposition-when-3x-trails-2x/</guid><description>A data-driven look at TQQQ’s five-year drawdown, volatility, and path dependence versus QLD and QQQ, showing why 3x trailed 2x in this window.</description></item><item><title>VOO DCA After 12 Months: Real Returns, Mistakes, and SCHD Contrast</title><link>https://investiqs.net/en/study/voo-dca-after-12-months-real-returns-mistakes-and-schd-contrast/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://investiqs.net/en/study/voo-dca-after-12-months-real-returns-mistakes-and-schd-contrast/</guid><description>VOO DCA after 12 months: real returns, SCHD comparison, and monthly ETF investing mistakes for U.S. investors.</description></item></channel></rss>